Fatal_S wrote:Maybe I'm just not a suspicious sort, but I chalk up the changes in rock colour to the lighting. When I take photos, sometimes the light makes everything look a certain way (full sun, partial sun, indoors under various lights, etc). And then I pick my favourite photos to post. They may not compare each skink exactly because the lights or camera position change, but they give an idea of what the skink looks like, which is all I want. I don't suspect photoshopping, that's too much effort to waste on a few photos of relatively cheap animals.
Black Cherry and his two male Meraukes are stunning and I need to go kidnap them. James is right, he should probably know the scientific names of his animals, but if he's got a good rep and shows the exact animals in photos before you buy, it just doesn't seem worth it to pester him over taking non-exact-colour photos or not knowing as much as us nerds do. I guess I'm willing to cut decent people some slack.
The uros on the other hand, some of those are just too darn pretty to be real. Wow. They're an animal I'm planning to get into soon, and now I'm drooling. So much to learn about the different species!
I agree, I looked very closely and it wasn't really noticeably different so much, there are many colors in the rocks and different angles can bring them out. I didn't see the full picture having an entirely different tint really. Although that one red one is a bit darker compared to the others so who knows.
I just know that when he sent me pics of the babies he had and i picked mine, it was the exact one in the pic and the exact color i asked for which was the silvery merauke i was looking for.