

















AndrewSeike wrote:Head shape is a good indicator but not always true. I just wanted to make sure all the newbies knew this. I even have a few Ijs without the fat heads but seen many without. Lol.
Andrew



AndrewSeike wrote:Thanks Kyle - I knew you meant it that way.
I'd also like to say that you're one of the people here that truly wants to learn AS MUCH as possible about skinks. Even I learn things everyday. I still don't know as much as I should and will make true efforts to get out in the field to see these guys in Australia. I would also like to see IJ's in the wild and feel that it needs serious work.
No one has gone out there because it's scary terrain out there. I'm afraid of it myself! But if i had the time, moeny and resources I'd go (after suffering a battery of shots for fear of contracting some horrid disease).
I wish I could take you with me to take a look at tons of them - especially in the past. Actually I'd love to take Zach and the entire group to see Tiliqua BEFORE ij's even came around. (I'm still ticked off as you can see.) There were so many more shinglebacks back then. How sad so many animals are just gone.
But yes getting back to the point of this thread - with all the information that you have gathered from your observations about this particular animal on this thread - the head shape does add credence to your final assessment of which I totally agree.
Good job!
Andrew
Return to “General Discussion and FAQ”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests